[no subject]

[arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)]

<fred@cisco.com>, Julien Laganier <julienl@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-12.txt>
References: <E1OvUns-0007wm-C0@psg.com>
X-PGP-Key-URL: http://natisbad.org/arno@natisbad.org.asc
X-Fingerprint: D3A5 B68A 839B 38A5 815A 781B B77C 0748 A7AE 341B
X-Hashcash:
1:20:100921:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org::U4mBCxlhQzq3tJQ1:00000000000000000000000000000000000003JZT
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:21:24 +0200
Message-ID: <87vd5zkqyj.fsf@small.ssi.corp>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

Hi,

owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org writes:

> The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to
> consider the following document:
> - 'Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premises
>    Equipment for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service'
>   <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-12.txt> as an Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2010-09-27. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

I posted a review of the draft on v6ops ML more than 2 months ago (Thu,
15 Jul 2010), with substantial comments:

 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg04815.html

Some of those are important for IPsec and MIPv6 to work. They were
acknowledged privately as valid.

Those comments were pointed again by Julien Laganier on the list (13 Sep
2010) a week ago:

 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg05349.html

I understand those comments are substantial but they address valid
issues, were provided a long time ago, text was proposed for some of
them and even picture clarify the issues.

Cheers,

a+