[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC

To: "YangGL" <iamyanggl@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:29:25 +0900
Cc: "'IPv6 v6ops'" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <001901cb4aaa$4c771740$e56545c0$@com>
References: <AANLkTim8kzSA8pKazc8u_w4C6j=y5bc-uArMWZaH9Nbm@mail.gmail.com> <C89A9B64.30FA2%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com> <002a01cb4712$d9f72fb0$8de58f10$@com> <B7569879-BD21-48EF-B411-BC99FAA48A22@cisco.com> <m2tyme7xb6.wl%randy@psg.com> <001901cb4aaa$4c771740$e56545c0$@com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> I can't see big controversy between NANOG experiments and mine.

you said

>>> Tests in my lab have proved that many popular applications cannot
>>> work on IPv6-only network with NAT64, such as IM, P2P, games, and
>>> part of video.

the nanog etc experiments showed otherwise.

please describe your experimental setup (the ops meetings' are
documented in the wiki) and exactly what failed and how.

randy

References:
- Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-08.txt
Next by Date: Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC
Previous by thread: Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC
Next by thread: Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread