Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC

[Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com>]

Hi Matsushima-san,
It is very useful sharing.
I read the slides by my guessing Japanese and Chinese characters.

Would you like to share your SAM/4rd use case in Internet Draft form for Sep 
21/22 WebEx meeting (I'm discussing with Fred whether change the date to one 
day earlier, i.e. Sep 20/21, due to the Mid Autumn Festival in some Asian 
countries)?
Especially, people may be interested at how the network devices and CPE 
needs to change to meet the SAM/4rd requirements? Is there other experience 
besides the RFC related to SAM/4rd?



Here is the original meeting scheduling, might be subject to change.

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v4tov6transition/current/msg00074.html



There were two I-Ds posted for the v4tov6transition work.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-v4v6tran-problem-00
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-v4v6tran-framework-00
You comments are very welcome.

I-Ds in the pipeline:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v4tov6transition/current/msg00129.html





B. R.
Tina
http://tinatsou.weebly.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: <satoru.matsushima@tm.softbank.co.jp>
Cc: <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>; <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; <v4tov6transition@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC


> Hi Satoru,
>
> I assume most people on the list don't read Japanese. If you can summarize 
> the press release to us, it will be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Yiu
>
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:04 PM, "satoru.matsushima@tm.softbank.co.jp" 
> <satoru.matsushima@tm.softbank.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > Hi Remi, Fred and Jari,
> >
> > FYI,
> > SPs in Japan, BBIX, Internet Multifeed, JPIX and IIJ-II unveil the 
> > intention of
> > adopting SAM/4rd as a solution for their IPv4 service over IPv6 native 
> > network.
> >
> > We then support including Remi's helpful comment for section 4.3 in the 
> > draft.
> >
> > Please take look at these joint press release.
> >
> > BBIX:
> > http://www.bbix.net/press/file/press_20100831.pdf
> >
> > Internet Multifeed:
> > http://www.mfeed.co.jp/press/2010/pdf/20100831.pdf
> >
> > JPIX:
> > http://www.jpix.ad.jp/jp/pdf/20100831_001.pdf
> >
> > IIJ-II:
> > http://www.iij.ad.jp/news/pressrelease/2010/0831.html
> >
> >
> > Since these documents are written in Japanese originally, English page 
> > does not
> > available by now. So please read these with online translation service 
> > (not sure that quality),
> > or find your friend who can read Japanese. Sorry for that inconvenience.
> >
> > --
> > Satoru Matsushima
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rémi Després [mailto:remi.despres@free.fr]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:06 PM
> > > To: Fred Baker; Jari Arkko
> > > Cc: IPv6 v6ops; Kurt Erik Lindqvist; Ron Bonica;
> > > v4tov6transition@ietf.org
> > > Subject: Re: draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC
> > >
> > > Hi Fred, hi Jari,
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late answer.
> > > 1.
> > > The main issue I see is the need for a better balance between
> > > dual stack throughout and IPv6 across IPv4 infrastructures as
> > > recommended approaches for rapid deployments.
> > > The latter approach is more recent (with RFC 5569 and RFC
> > > 5969 issued in January and August 2010 respectively) but, as
> > > it proved to be the preferred one by a number of ISPs for
> > > their first deployment, it should be documented as such.
> > > 2.
> > > Also, there appears a converging interest for 4rd, the
> > > reverse of 6rd for IPv4 connectivity across IPv6-only ISP
> > > infrastructures (draft-vautrin-softwire-4rd-00 and
> > > draft-despres-softwire-sam-01 sec. 3.2).
> > > As it is a potential alternative or complement to DS-lite,
> > > that some ISPs can consider, and that at least one does
> > > consider on a confidential basis, it should IMHO be
> > > mentioned. (Of course it shouldn't be hidden that the
> > > specification is still much less advanced than that of DS-lite).
> > >
> > > Attached is a modified version of draft-06, in PDF and and in
> > > .doc, in  which I propose an example text to cover these points.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > RD
> > _______________________________________________
> > v4tov6transition mailing list
> > v4tov6transition@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition
> _______________________________________________
> v4tov6transition mailing list
> v4tov6transition@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition