Re: I-D Action:draft-vandevelde-v6ops-harmful-tunnels-01.txt

[Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>]

Gert,

> For the large mass of end users, they don't seem to see a benefit in
> deploying IPv6 while their IPv4 internet is still working - so I doubt
> that the originally-envisioned usage case of 6to4-with-anycast (3068)

Is 6to4-with-anycast the most deployed form of 6to4?

FWIW, Windows does not use the 6to4 anycast address, but rather resolves
6to4.ipv6.microsoft.com, and uses the corresponding a records for the
destination address of tunneled packets (Hurrican Electric relays, the
last time that I checked). One would guess that for managed 6to4 routers
this would be even more so the case.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1