[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lee-v4v6tran-problem-00]
- To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lee-v4v6tran-problem-00]
- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:40:56 +1200
- Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=gRznjISa2Y14jBaXzqLRtpzSC06ZqvGqGQQLiLWiPkirm7eBDuma8YWkfKBL0xN+tg In4RDiqbIJcZStYGIlbLPTTDQ4ULza+ypTc5FGB/VXj0zZ/1f6KandXAr5XSmxnierjC CuWIe0Y622wQi5/rczKnDxOliMadmqHMMHqJ4=
- In-reply-to: <m2tymb3byx.wl%randy@psg.com>
- Organization: University of Auckland
- References: <4C7C334A.8070606@gmail.com> <m2tymb3byx.wl%randy@psg.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
On 2010-08-31 11:41, Randy Bush wrote:
>> This should help to clarify the reasons for publishing
>> draft-carpenter-v4v6tran-framework
>
>> o What is the recommended prefix length for a large operator?
>>
>> o What is the recommended prefix length for a medium operator?
>>
>> o What is the recommended prefix length to hand out to customers?
>>
>> o What is the recommended longest prefix length an operator should
>> accept from customers?
>
> you gotta love it. we spend a decade getting the ietf out of telling
> operators how to run our business, and here we go again.
I agree that the end product in this case shouldn't be firm
recommendations (see draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary for
the discussion). But the reasons why different lengths suit
different cases are worth describing.
Brian