Re: draft-carpenter-v4v6tran-framework

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> I applaud any and all such work, but I will note that I'm somewhat
> skeptical of another IETF effort in this front.  The previous
> experience was a challenge enough.

those who do not remember ngtrans are doomed to repeat it.

> I wonder if similar goals could be met by working on documenting these
> in a wiki. Write drafts if it helps focus discussion, but turning the
> crank to produce 10+ RFCs that will get outdated soon enough doesn't
> seem like worth the effort.

agree.  my guess is that documentation is either un-useful pontification
which lacks detail or is useful but ephemeral.

randy