[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG



 

Tina,

 

It appears that there are two distinct issues being debated here. These are:

 

-          Is there interesting work to be done?

-          Do we need a new WG in which to do this work?

 

The IETF has procedures to address both questions. In order to determine the answer to the first question, the DT should submit its problem statement, framework and (possibly) an annotated bibliography to the v6ops wg. They are clearly within the charter of the v6ops and the v6ops chairs have indicated a willingness to entertain these drafts. If the wg adopts and progresses this drafts, the framework will be set for subsequent drafts.

 

At this time, I don’t see any need for a new WG. The operational expertise that we need to review these documents lives in v6 ops, and if we were to spin off an new working group, it would probably be populated by the same people who populate v6ops today. However, I will keep a eye on this situation to see if it changes.

 

                                                                                         Your friendly AD,

                                                                                             Ron