[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NAT444 v NAT64

On 2010-08-26 01:41, huang cancan wrote:
> well, I mean: why customer experience of IPv4-only + NAT444 could be the
> same as IPv6-only + NAT64?

There are application scenarios that will work through a single layer
of NAT and fail through a double layer of NAT. I would have thought
this would have considerable impact on customer experience.

There are other negative impacts on content providers too, that were
discussed in a bar BOF in Anaheim.

   Brian