Re: draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC

[Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>]

>
> Yes, though for the record, draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience does say that
> under certain assumptions (the ability to pick the right user devices) you
> reach 100% functionality.
>

I would be very happy if we included the above point in the transition
draft section 4.4

> I do believe that IPv6-only (with nat64) is an excellent approach for mobile
> networks, and I hope we will soon see this in widespread commercial usage.

And this above point too.

The draft only includes a green field corporate LAN as the use case
for IPv6-only.... and testing.  I believe adding the above points will
add mobile IPv6-only APNs as another relevant use case, not for
special purpose sensor networks, but generic IPv6 capable phones with
NAT64 systems to access the Internet.

I am perfectly fine with saying that dual-stack is the default IETF
recommended strategy as long as we also say that with some
consideration  and qualifications IPv6-only can be just as capable.

Thanks Jari.

Cameorn