Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC

[Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>]

>
> i agree that DS is not what you want off the backbone.  v6 with nat64
> should be encouraged at home and at work.  but i think you want the isps
> to have dual stack backbones for a while.

Yes, I agree.  I  tend to only speak for my use case in mobile
wireless.  The numbering problem is at the end nodes and access
providers have to feel the pain (or no gain).  DS backbone should be
old hat for the major backbone ISPs.