[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nimrod for IPv6?

To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Nimrod for IPv6?
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:17:16 -0700
In-reply-to: <4C6C5986.7080009@gont.com.ar>
References: <4C6C5986.7080009@gont.com.ar>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2

the nimrod drafts and rfc's were done as part of the ipng process.

so yeah rfc 1753 isn't really aimed at anything other than the future
ipng protocol even if nimrod is/was agnostic about that...

On 8/18/10 3:07 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Hi, folks,
> 
> Routing Header Type 1, and option 0x8a (Endpoint Identification), are
> related to the Nimrod routing system.
> 
> Has Nimrod for IPv6 ever been specified? If so, has there ever been any
> deployments?
> 
> Put another way: should one expect to find occurrences of RHT1 and/or
> option 0x8a?

I would imagine not.

> Thanks!
> 
> Kind regards,

References:
- Nimrod for IPv6?
  - From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>

Prev by Date: Re: draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC
Next by Date: Re: [v4tov6transition] draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC
Previous by thread: Nimrod for IPv6?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread