[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-gundavelli-v6ops-l2-unicast WGLC



I think this draft has some operational utility and therefore support its adoption as WG draft.

Regards,

Behcet

From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; 6man Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Cc: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Sent: Sat, July 31, 2010 12:54:27 AM
Subject: draft-gundavelli-v6ops-l2-unicast WGLC

This is to initiate a two week working group last call of draft-gundavelli-v6ops-l2-unicast. Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to the combined lists.

We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the document as well as its content. If you have read the document and believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important comment to make.