Re: draft-azinger-cidrv6-00

[Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>]

Hi Leo,

> Firstly, in section 4, I think it would be useful to note that RIRs should aim to aggregate an ISPs second and later allocation with earlier allocations. I believe this is already done but it would be good to recommend it. I'd like to suggest the second sentence below be added.
> 
> "RIRs initial and subsequent allocation policy to service providers should allow for a minimum of 2 years worth of usage based on historical or business plan projections. Further, RIRs should implement practices that maximise the potential for subsequent allocations to be made contiguous with previous allocations."
> 
> Also, in section 10 it is recommended that "Internet Registries should severely limit or eliminate [...] PI assignments". There are obviously reasons for the current policies allowing IPv6 PI assignments but the potential for significant routing table growth has not been removed, so I wonder whether it would make sense to request the RIR communities to review the impact of PI assignment policies on the rate of routing table growth on a regular basis. 


The authors concur and unless there is some dissent from the list, we'll amend accordingly.

Tony