Re: IPv6 Operations - IETF 78

[Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>]

Sorry, thanks.

On Jul 14, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Seiichi Kawamura wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I requested a slot for at Maastricht
> a while back for draft-kawamura-ipv6-isp-listings-00
> (forgot to Cc list)
> 
> Is v6ops a suitable place to discuss and get input?
> 
> Regards,
> Seiichi
> 
> Fred Baker wrote:
>> Checking: is this the right agenda? Any issues?
>> IPv6 Operations - IETF 78
>> 
>> Monday 13:00-14:59
>> 
>> Agenda bashing
>> 
>> Mobile Networks Considerations for IPv6 Deployment
>> 12-Jul-10, <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-in-mobile-networks-01.txt>
>> CIDR for IPv6: Address Aggregation
>> 29-Jun-10, <draft-azinger-cidrv6-00.txt>
>> Advanced Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers
>> 8-Jul-10, <draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-03.txt>
>> BBF Liaison Discussion
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/922/
>> Friday 13:00-14:59
>> 
>> Flexible DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation in Mobile Networks
>> 10-May-10, <draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-01.txt>
>> Security Concerns With IP Tunneling
>> 8-Mar-10, <draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns-02.txt>
>> Routing Loop Attack using IPv6 Automatic Tunnels: Problem Statement and Proposed Mitigations
>> 12-May-10, <draft-nakibly-v6ops-tunnel-loops-02.txt>
>> An Incremental Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) for IPv6 Transition
>> 18-Jun-10, <draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn-01.txt>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkw+T4MACgkQcrhTYfxyMkJOwACfSb0kaVE1EncEOnOIH5w3n6ha
> +qYAnivvI69MJqmR6DxCOTezwwMJ9b6G
> =DUmV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF