draft-nakibly-v6ops-tunnel-loops as a WG item? (was Re: Agenda for 78th IETF)

[Gabi Nakibly <gnakibly@yahoo.com>]

Fred, 
I would like to propose the adoption of the 
draft draft-nakibly-v6ops-tunnel-loops as a WG item. The draft documents the 
routing loop attack and mitigation measures and practices as discussed on the 
list. I believe that the document contains some useful information for network 
operators who wishes to securely deploy IPv6 within an IPv4 network. The 
document falls under goal #2 of the WG charter:

    2. Publish Informational or BCP RFCs that identify potential security
    risks in the operation of shared IPv4/IPv6 networks, and document
    operational practices to eliminate or mitigate those risks.

I will appreciate yours and the list's feedback.

Best regards,
Gabi

----- Original Message ----
> From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
> To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 9:55:41 AM
> Subject: Agenda for 78th IETF
> 
> I rather expected to get requests for
> 
>         draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-01.txt
>         draft-nakibly-v6ops-tunnel-loops-02.txt
>         draft-korhonen-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt
>         draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn-01.txt
> 
> What I have is the following.
> 
> Those who want agenda time should please post drafts to support it and should 
>let me know. We were in fact given two slots in the initial agenda. If things 
>remain as they stand, I'll cut that back to one.
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
> > Date: June 24, 2010 5:33:31 AM PDT
> > To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> > Subject: Agenda call
> > 
> > Anyone who wants time, please drop me a note.
> > 
> > Note that the Secretariat and IESG are currently struggling with the agenda, 
>and we may very well wind up with one slot instead of two. I want to give all 
>the time needed for discussions we need to have, and not waste time arguing for 
>the second slot if we won't actually use it. So I really need to know this week.
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
> > Date: June 24, 2010 7:19:46 AM PDT
> > To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, "IPv6 Operations" 
><v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> > Cc: "Ole Troan" <ot@cisco.com>, <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> > Subject: RE: Agenda call
> > 
> > Ole, Tim and myself would like few minutes on the harmful tunnels work.
> > It is to be re-submitted very soon.
> > 
> > G/
> > 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com>
> > Date: June 24, 2010 5:51:55 AM PDT
> > To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
> > Subject: Re: Agenda call
> > 
> > 
> > ------ Forwarded Message
> > From: Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com>
> > Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:09:06 -0700
> > To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
> > Conversation: Looking for v6ops agenda items
> > Subject: Re: Looking for v6ops agenda items
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Fred,
> > 
> > I would like 10 minutes please. Depending on the "agenda density", I could
> > use 5 more minutes for Q&A.
> > 
> > draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-in-mobile-networks
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > -Rajeev
> > 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
> > Date: June 24, 2010 7:22:15 AM PDT
> > To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
> > Cc: "Tony Hain (ahain)" <ahain@cisco.com>, "Chip Popoviciu (cpopovic)" 
><cpopovic@cisco.com>
> > Subject: RE: Agenda call
> > 
> > Hi Fred,
> > 
> > I would like to ask 10 minutes time to discuss "IP protocol
> > selection"... its not a draft yet, but the idea is out there and I just
> > have to write it down... should be done rather soon once I get to it.
> > 
> > G/
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: <Jason.Weil@cox.com>
> > Date: June 27, 2010 11:39:30 AM PDT
> > To: <fred@cisco.com>
> > Cc: <marla.azinger@frontiercorp.com>, <tli@cisco.com>
> > Subject: RE: Agenda call
> > 
> > Fred,
> > 
> > Tony Li, Marla Azinger and I would like a few minutes to discuss a CIDR for 
>IPv6 draft which is basically an update to RFC4632. It will be submitted to the 
>list shortly. Either Marla or I will be in attendance to present.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jason
> 
> 
>