[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4213 (2172)

To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4213 (2172)
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:27:31 -0300
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Erik Nordmark <erik.nordmark@sun.com>, bob.gilligan@acm.org, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@avaya.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, IPv6 v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=O/xww+6K53DxfCg/EWAfiCWEDJvye67i/yv8IiJukYKWvPZjEUTM5CDuYoQOH00PNx yXwLBa82Q9JHqjAtAFTkqpcynYZ0Sn3Z+tOYjOQhcJVwYcTBPY+HuozqbOlYT9dLjqSL 6XVZoe+MmSxz61CVwvD8IfYJ1B4KoWY5+OSJ4=
In-reply-to: <E885A7FD-3C4D-4936-AF2A-112F422752A7@cisco.com>
Openpgp: id=D076FFF1
References: <20100425203032.87CDBE07C3@rfc-editor.org> <E885A7FD-3C4D-4936-AF2A-112F422752A7@cisco.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)

Hi, Fred,

BTW, the sentence should have ended with "...at more length in the
Security Considerations section".

(i.e., also ad "the" and "section").

Thanks,
Fernando




Fred Baker wrote:
> This sounds like a grammar check. If so, I would suggest "This issue and the remaining known threats..."..
> 
> On Apr 25, 2010, at 9:30 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> 
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4213,
>> "Basic Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4213&eid=2172
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
>>
>> Section: 4
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> The issue and the remainder threats are discussed at more length in Security Considerations.
>>
>>
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> This issue and the remainder threats are discussed at more length in Security Considerations.
>>
>>
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>>
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC4213 (draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-07)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Basic Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers
>> Publication Date    : October 2005
>> Author(s)           : E. Nordmark, R. Gilligan
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : IPv6 Operations
>> Area                : Operations and Management
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF
> 
> 

-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

References:
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4213 (2172)
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4213 (2172)
Next by Date: Re: RS sending in draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-04
Previous by thread: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4213 (2172)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread