Re: FYI: DNSOPS presentation

[Jason Livingood <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>]

This is getting a little pointless to debate.  While I am happy that you
have provided data, across the entirety of the public Internet I think we
could use a little more.  The point I was making was that other than that
one post with data solely from you, I haven't seen a wave of data coming
out.  I do not mean to discount the value of your data or that you have
shared, but I still feel we need data from more than just you if the matter
is to move ahead.  I'm sure others, including us, are doing data gathering.
My only point was that none of that has come to fruition as of yet.

Jason


On 4/21/10 2:31 AM, "Tore Anderson" <tore.anderson@redpill-linpro.com>
wrote:

> * Jason Livingood
> 
>> I copied and pasted in a message you sent to the list, hoping to hear
>> input from others.
> 
> Hi again, Jason.  Perhaps I was being unclear in my initial response to
> you yesterday.  Allow me try again:
> 
> - In [1], you post a message quoting data elaborating on the causes of
>   IPv6 client loss as observed from a content provider's point of view.
> - In [2], a few weeks later, you claim that no public data on IPv6
>   client loss exists.
> 
> It appears to me that you needed to look no further than in your own
> sent-mail folder to find examples of such data, so it is your claim of
> this data being non-existent that puzzles me.
> 
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg08383.html
> [2] http://www.comcast6.net/IPv6_DNS_Whitelisting_Concerns_20100416.pdf
> 
> Best regards,