[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-10

To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
Subject: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-10
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:59:41 -0700
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <4BCDABC7.9060503@htt-consult.com>
References: <955E4D2B-1212-4CFE-B06B-9B91B66EB7E0@apple.com> <4BCDABC7.9060503@htt-consult.com>

On Apr 20, 2010, at 06:27, Robert Moskowitz wrote:

> HIP is on track to be reved for standards track.  It is assigned Protocol number 139, and should be treated by cpe-simple-security the same as IKE.  I will offer my best effort at text below.

I agree.  If no one objects, I will import the suggested amendments.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering

Follow-Ups:
- Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-10
  - From: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>

References:
- I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-10
  - From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
- Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-10
  - From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>

Prev by Date: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-10.txt
Next by Date: Re: New Version Notification for draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-02
Previous by thread: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-10
Next by thread: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-10
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread