[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: DNSOPS presentation
* Mohacsi Janos
>> Yes, that the effect of the change proposed in
>> draft-arifumi-6man-rfc3484-revise-02, and also how Microsoft's
>> getaddrinfo() currently behaves. I strongly support the proposed
>> change.
>>
>> RFC 3484, however, currently says to prefer 6to4 over IPv4 NAT44
>> (or more precisely RFC 1918 IPv4).
>
> However all the existing implemention prefers IPv4 with RFC1918
> addresses.
That is not the case. Mac OS X and GNU libc+derivates are two prominent
examples of getaddrinfo()/RFC 3484 implementations that follow the RFC
to the letter. They prefer 6to4 over (RFC 1918) IPv4.
That's what causing most of the client loss in my dual-stack measurements.
Best regards,
--
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27