[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: New Version Notification for draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-02

To: <rkoodli@cisco.com>, <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-02
From: <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:44:30 +0200
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <C7EDF750.534E%rkoodli@cisco.com>
References: <18034D4D7FE9AE48BF19AB1B0EF2729F59D5E2FC5B@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com> <C7EDF750.534E%rkoodli@cisco.com>

> As I mentioned in a previous email, Deferred IP address allocation is
> specified for use in LTE. If 3G handsets do not do DHCP, it does not
> mean LTE handsets should not, right?

DHCP is optional in Release-8. 

Handsets have managed to work in 3GPP access for a decade or so without DHCP based address allocation (GPRS, EGPRS, WCDMA, HSDPA..). Why they would want to implement DHCP for LTE?

Best regards,

Teemu

References:
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-02
  - From: <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com>
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-02
  - From: Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: New Version Notification for draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-02
Next by Date: Re: New Version Notification for draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-02
Previous by thread: Re: New Version Notification for draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-02
Next by thread: Re: New Version Notification for draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-02
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread