RE: RS sending in draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-04

["Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com>]

-----Original Message-----
From: pch-b6B5344D9@u-1.phicoh.com [mailto:pch-b6B5344D9@u-1.phicoh.com]
On Behalf Of Philip Homburg
Sent: 15 April 2010 20:31
To: Wojciech Dec (wdec)
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: RS sending in draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-04 

In your letter dated Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:02:52 +0200 you wrote:
>
>
>
>On 15/04/2010 18:38, "Philip Homburg" <pch-v6ops@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
>
>>> The LIO is one key, however the LL and unicast IP addresses of a CE
need to
>>> be correlated to that key, hence they are essential pieces of info.
>> 
>> Why would the edge router even look at the source address if there is
a
>> LIO? 
>
>It's necessary to know the source address for an LIO in order to at
least
>associate that IP to the LIO identity.

Which node needs the link local address of the CPE? The edge router or
the access node? (using draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-03 terminology)

Woj> Likely both: The edge router is expected to have an address binding
table per CPE and so may the access-node.

-Woj.