Re: FW: WPD-6, WAA-8, and WAA-9 of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-04

[Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops@u-1.phicoh.com>]

In your letter dated Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:36:37 +0200 you wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:52:23PM +0200, Philip Homburg wrote:
>> Like I said, from the point of view of the SP router, assigning an address
>> to a virtual interface or to the WAN interface is almost indistinguishable.
>
>Think "ND/NA/DAD" and "connected routes".  There is a lot of difference.

DAD:
- The SP router sees a couple of multicasts for a random IPv6 address which
  it will ignore.
NS/NA:
- I said that before, in rare circumstances, the SP router may see a NS
  with that address as source address. Is that a really big deal? 

Please explain how you would get a connected route? Even though the SP
router may create a NC entry for the address, I don't why it would also
consider the address to be onlink. Unless you consider every address with a
NC entry to be onlink.