Re: WPD-6, WAA-8, and WAA-9 of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-04

[Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops@u-1.phicoh.com>]

In your letter dated Tue, 6 Apr 2010 19:57:44 +0200 you wrote:
>> Suppose we have a packet with source S, and destination D. At =
>Ethernet0 with
>> address I we discover that we cannot forward the packet anymore. So we
>> generate an ICMP with source I and destination S and use Ethernet0's =
>default
>> router (probably internal to the node because we a talking about a =
>router) to
>> send the packet on its way to S.
>>=20
>> Whether destination D is at Serial0 or not is irrelant.
>
>me thinks you are confused...

Yes, I am completely confused about the point you are trying to make.

But I have more enough experience with IPv4 and IPv6 strict multi-homing
implementations to know how they behave in practice.

So maybe you can give enough details about your scenario to make it possible
for someone else to verify whether strict multi-homing will fail in the
way you say it will or not.