>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred)
>Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 12:21 PM
>To: Ole Troan
>Cc: Mark Townsley (townsley); IPv6 v6ops
>Subject: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-04
>I have not yet sent it to the IEG. If you want to change it, post one now.
>In any event, I expect there would be another round of community review.
Good to hear that, Fred. Mark Townsley also jabbered a comment on Friday in the v6ops meeting that the Intro or Abstract of the Phase I IPv6 CE Rtr should be a little more clear to define its goals for simple vs. Advanced etc. Did I get this fact correctly? If yes, then once I get the exact quote from Mark's comments we can look into editing our document. Mark also commented on what does one mean by "support" in his email. But now the bullet seems to need more work because soon as one says a feature is configurable, the next question others will ask is, "well, what's the default"? So here is a little more modified text suggestion from me for the relevant bullet.
S-1: The IPv6 CE router SHOULD implement [I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security]. Enabling or disabling the security functionality MUST be user configurable. The default for whether simple security is enabled or disabled is specified in I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security].
Now so we have single source to reference our bullet's properties from; the source being the I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security. Now it's up to v6ops as a WG to nail down which of enabled or disabled is the default in the I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security.document.
Hemant