Re: On filibusters as a mode of technical discussion

[Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>]

On Mar 24, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Mark Townsley wrote:

> Then consider much of the discussion as a prelude to what kind of alternative solution we need. If we are to have an alternative, those that do not agree with the current status quo need to be able to state why.

As I said a couple of messages back, I suggested to Eric last night that he collect a group of like-minded individuals and describe that alternative. Yes, I would expect that the proposal would contain discussion of the philosophy behind it. I suspect that your+his draft is a start at that, although I won't hold you (collectively) to it, and I would suggest an early security directorate review.

http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF