[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: simple security



On 23 mar 2010, at 16.48, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:

>> 
>> It was also argued that attacks of this kind simply don't exist in IPv6.
> 
> Which is true.
> 
>> That sounds like the argument that faults in the space shuttle o-ring
>> haven't caused explosions before, so it's safe.
> 
> No. It's just an argument that operating systems have already been fixed 
> *before* they implemented IPv6. Common attack vectors are in different 
> (higher) parts of the software stack, against which stateful firewalls are 
> totally helpless.

If we believe that the attacks that today exist in IPv4 won't exist in IPv6 I think we are highly underestimating the investments in the underground economy. I am convinced we will see the same level of attacks and exploits for IPv6 as for IPv4. That said, I am not convinced that any security in the CPE will protect against that, just as NAT didn't protect in IPv4. However, I don't think that is the issue that we are trying to address with the simple security draft. 

Best regards,

- kurtis -




Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part