[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: On filibusters as a mode of technical discussion

To: RÃmi Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net>
Subject: Re: On filibusters as a mode of technical discussion
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 06:51:08 +1300
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=lOAP65lAV6u8YITB1whsp1JFepyVwQPZeczw8iZqEvB/oIiBuLj+Ag5+gSnV+V4v2q dicj5mfxB66dSepoQ8QJRdS8OBIVG3oRLoZUo1t4UGAqgPqNQ5VmxC8aC2+VLstmhjOA jP9qL84dyf34xM45m4/CSQfIIFlQGi8FRKimU=
In-reply-to: <6204173481567b7e39bc759ddee930d7@chewa.net>
Organization: University of Auckland
References: <4BA78BE7.6010005@cisco.com> <EA891983-B4D3-4687-A9E2-4DC95E61FA58@cisco.com> <6204173481567b7e39bc759ddee930d7@chewa.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

RÃmi,

Fred asked us to stop the discussion and move on. There are two
views, and the next version of the draft will make it clear, as
agreed yesterday, that this is the case. Having two views in the
IETF is not unusual.

    Brian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On filibusters as a mode of technical discussion
  - From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>

References:
- On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)
  - From: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
- On filibusters as a mode of technical discussion
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- Re: On filibusters as a mode of technical discussion
  - From: RÃmi Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net>

Prev by Date: Re: On saving end-to-end transparency
Next by Date: Re: simple security
Previous by thread: Re: On filibusters as a mode of technical discussion
Next by thread: Re: On filibusters as a mode of technical discussion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread