[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)

To: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:32:38 -0700
Cc: IPv6 v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <4BA78BE7.6010005@cisco.com>
References: <4BA78BE7.6010005@cisco.com>

That will have to be a working group decision. We have your opinion on the record.

On Mar 22, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Mark Townsley wrote:

> Let's err on the side of our ideals here. Publish draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security, but do so without default-deny rules on by default. Let's not break end-to-end IPv6 before it even has a chance to grow up.

http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF

Follow-Ups:
- Re: On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
- Re: On saving end-to-end transparency
  - From: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>

References:
- On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)
  - From: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)
Next by Date: Re: On saving end-to-end transparency
Previous by thread: On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)
Next by thread: Re: On saving end-to-end transparency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread