RE: Proposed agenda for IPv6 Operations

Fred,

The new agenda posted on the webpages does not seem to match the one

you posted to the list:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/agenda/v6ops.html

Seeing that there are new additions, I would like to propose to add the

RANGER, VET and SEAL trilogy – preferably as the final session on

Friday, as I have two other conflicts for the earlier portion of that session.

The talk would require 15min, and would cover all three documents

together (i.e., not as three separate talks). The documents are here:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5720.txt

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-vet

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-seal

Thanks – Fred

fred.l.templin@boeing.com

From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:06 PM
To: IPv6 Operations
Subject: Proposed agenda for IPv6 Operations - IETF 77

Comments please... Basically I am putting three security issues and two 3GPP-relevant drafts on Monday morning and the remainder on Friday morning. Each discussion gets about half an hour. If time permits in the meeting, I'll pull agenda items forward from Friday to Monday. I have two drafts on here that were not marked for v6ops but the authors asked me to include; next time I'd appreciate it if folks used the draft-*-v6ops-* naming convention; it makes my job easier. If I have missed anything, let me know.