Re: RFC 5006 status

[Syam Madanapalli <smadanapalli@gmail.com>]

What I understood from your arguments is that you have a solution and
we need to find a problem.


On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 19 mars 2010 à 15:22, Syam Madanapalli a écrit :
>> And if you are proposing the RA DHCP option for DNS server address
>> alone,
>
> I am not.

You can put the list here, and the need for these list to be in RAs.

> Just the opposite.
> It is RFC 5006 which has this limitation.

RFC 5006 has been written for a single and specific option.
You seem to be justifying DHCP into RA based on RFC 5006
defining DNS Server Address Option, which in my views is
incorrect.

>
>
>> I hope there will not be another proposal for RA into DHCP :-)
>
> Your job, (in any case not mine ;-).
>
> RD
>
>
>