[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RFC 5006 status
- To: <fred@cisco.com>, <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: RFC 5006 status
- From: <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:57:27 +0100
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, <rdroms@cisco.com>, <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, <dthaler@wollive.windowsmedia.com.akadns.net>, <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, <jjeong@cs.umn.edu>, <luc.beloeil@orange-ftgroup.com>, <smadanapalli@gmail.com>, <soohong.park@samsung.com>
- In-reply-to: <308C7176-40DF-4F82-AC2D-A4EAC6E2766B@cisco.com>
- References: <4B9DFC7D.3070704@piuha.net> <E47F4C05-D53D-4E04-B15F-07752E9D9A7E@cisco.com> <4B9E96E2.10108@piuha.net> <1315FBDA-12A2-4C16-B66F-CBD4802E6766@cisco.com> <4BA089F9.5010006@piuha.net> <65B6B54D-98AD-4772-B2E0-6E2CA8DE76C0@cisco.com> <419DB14D-BFDC-4118-BB3E-F4D9570D927D@kurtis.pp.se> <A5AB4B97-11BA-4D27-860C-3811D075BFC6@cisco.com> <4BA0EC66.3010403@piuha.net> <308C7176-40DF-4F82-AC2D-A4EAC6E2766B@cisco.com>
We have implemented this on Symbian OS and on Nokia S40 OS. Tested against RADVD and TAHI. Not released in products yet.
Would like to see this go to Proposed Standard.
Best regards,
Teemu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of ext Fred Baker
> Sent: 17. maaliskuuta 2010 17:19
> To: IPv6 Operations
> Cc: Lindqvist Kurt Erik; Ralph Droms; 6man Chairs; Dave Thaler; Jari
> Arkko; jjeong@cs.umn.edu; luc.beloeil@orange-ftgroup.com;
> smadanapalli@gmail.com; Daniel Park
> Subject: RFC 5006 status
>
> This is a structured question for the community.
>
> Jari Arkko tells us that he is getting requests from various sources to
> take RFC 5006 to Proposed Standard. It is now experimental.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5006.txt
> 5006 IPv6 Router Advertisement Option for DNS Configuration. J. Jeong,
> Ed., S. Park, L. Beloeil, S. Madanapalli. September 2007. (Format:
> TXT=26136 bytes) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL)
>
> (1) Please take a look at the document in the next few days; if you
> have comments on it (eg, you think it should be changed in some way),
> please comment to v6ops.
>
> (2) Vendors, please advise on implementations. Are there any? Has
> interoperability been demonstrated?
>
> (3) Operators, enterprise and/or service provider, please advise on
> deployment experience.
>
>
> I'm adding a brief discussion to the agenda Monday morning with a view
> to getting a quick thumbs-up/thumbs-down to advise Jari, who can then
> take that to 6man later in the week if appropriate.
>
>
>
> BTW, I have had a flurry of email related to the agenda. The current
> agenda may be found at
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/agenda/v6ops.html