Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09

[Mark Baugher <mbaugher@cisco.com>]

I think this is an important document that seems to be ready to be published.  I have a couple of concerns:

1. Rec-2.  Why not site-scope?

2. Rec-42.  Pardon me if I'm being dense, but what are you saying here?  That service providers cannot manage the device from an exterior interface?

There are many SHOULDs and some should be MUSTs.  I have a long list of nits and such.  I'll send the markups directly to you, James.  Is this Last Call or is this going into Last Call soon?

Mark


On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:06 PM, james woodyatt wrote:

> everyone--
> 
> Once again, I'd like to ask for some discussion and feedback on this draft.  Is there any reason this revision of the draft should not proceed to Working Group Last Call at this time?
> 
> 
> --
> james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
> member of technical staff, communications engineering
> 
> 
>