Re: IPv6 multihoming

[Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>]

Vlad,

I suggest that you study the current work in SOFTWIRE, BEHAVE, the RRG, and
LISP. These are not new problems, and as several people have said, getting
an IPv6 prefix (whether PI or PA) is the least of our problems.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter


On 2010-01-27 07:58, Vlad Ion wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Unfortunately it is not as easy as just turning it on like in the case of
> IPv4 where you set your ip and that's it - you have access to the internet.
> If you set v6 instead of v4 on a server you get access to people in the v6
> and 6to4 by having a 6to4 relay but then you need nat-pt for v4
> connectivity. or I may be mistaking but that was the case with the servers I
> set v6 on till now.
> 
> BR,
> Vlad
> 
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Andy Davidson <andy@nosignal.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 26/01/2010 17:29, Vlad Ion wrote:
>>> The idea was that people should only need to switch v6 on
>> Hi,
>>
>> This really is easy enough already.
>>
>> The problem is that people are not turning it on, not that access to
>> numbers is difficult.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>