[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-04.txt WGLC

To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-04.txt WGLC
From: Eduardo Ascenço Reis <eduardo@intron.com.br>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:34:02 -0200
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org, kurtis@kurtis.pp.se, rbonica@juniper.net
In-reply-to: <1F22A806-8341-4FB0-8135-3518574C7661@cisco.com>
References: <1F22A806-8341-4FB0-8135-3518574C7661@cisco.com>

Hi Fred and Fellows,

2010/1/18 Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>:

> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the document
> as well as its content. If you have read the document and believe it to be
> of operational utility, that is also an important comment to make.
>

I am directly involved with IXP (http://ptt.br/) - already with IPv6
support - and believe that this is an important document that should
be discussed and supported by this working group.

I will do some comments on separated messages.

-- 

Eduardo Ascenço Reis

References:
- draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-04.txt WGLC
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Implementation of the RA Route Information (RFC 4191) option?
Next by Date: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-04.txt WGLC
Previous by thread: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-04.txt WGLC
Next by thread: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-04.txt WGLC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread