[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-03.txt
On Jan 11, 2010, at 10:11, Templin, Fred L wrote:
>
> James Woodyatt's disclaimer notwithstanding, does anyone see an issue with using unsolicited, unicast NAs?
For prefix redirection?
p1. I think this is better deferred to the -bis draft.
p2. I don't think it will be practical for CPE routers to send prefix redirections to other nodes on the WAN link in neighbor advertisements. I think default routers on the WAN link should send ICMP redirects to hosts. The validity check on ICMP redirects are a good idea. Even better idea in the presence of SEND.
--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering