Hi, On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:33:05AM -0800, Templin, Fred L wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 08:58:51AM -0800, Templin, Fred L wrote: > > > Why can't a CPE router send unicast RAs to other CPE > > > routers as long as they are not malicious and do not > > > in any way conflict with the RAs sent by SP routers? > > > > How do you verify those are not malicious? > > The sending CPE has to supply sufficient credentials to > prove that it is authorized to advertise a given set of > prefixes. Which is, as far as I understand, not part of any currently standardized RAs. Are there any drafts specifying this? So while I can see CPE-to-CPE RA as "nice to have", I can't really see the relevance for the WGLC of *this* document. Gert Doering -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 144438 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
Attachment:
pgpIKQtymFGZd.pgp
Description: PGP signature