RE: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

Jordi, why this will work as is for now?
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 5:28 PM
> To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN
> 
> Hi Thomas, all,
> 
> During my fly-back from Montreal, I've worked in a proposal 
> and I'm talking to folks in each RIR/region, with the idea to 
> submit it to all them as a kind of (if possible), global policy.
> 
> The idea is based on the comments that I did at the mic 
> during the ARIN meeting.
> 
> I will try to get this submitted next Monday/Tuesday and get 
> ready for a formal presentation during the next RIPE meeting 
> at Istanbul (following week).
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > De: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
> > Responder a: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> > Fecha: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:14:54 -0400
> > Para: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
> > CC: "v6ops@ops.ietf.org" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> > Asunto: Re: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN
> > 
> >> What would be the prefix allocation per organization?
> > 
> > /48, though can be larger in some cases. Watch for the revised 
> > proposal that gets last called for details.
> > 
> >> (Me being in Europe and not attending ARIN sessions)
> > 
> > Note: none of the other RIRs have such a policy in place 
> today, though 
> > I wouldn't be surprised if they now followup with proposals 
> of their 
> > own (though someone has to do it).
> > 
> >> Has there been study on the # of organizations going for 
> this and if 
> >> the impact will be more significant then more's law on technology 
> >> enhancement?
> > 
> > Mostly just hand waving, with a lot of "IPv4 hasn't melted today,"
> > "looking at the impact of the current IPv4 policies, the 
> number of PI 
> > assignments is only on the 100s per year", and "we can update the 
> > policy if things get problematical".
> > 
> > Thomas
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
> 
> Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
> Slides available at:
> http://www.ipv6-es.com
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be 
> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
> for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not 
> the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, 
> distribution or use of the contents of this information, 
> including attached files, is prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>