[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Address Scanning Document comments

To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Address Scanning Document comments
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:35:49 -0600
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20060323013237.GJ5716@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <7E559822-A5F2-4E8B-B520-5D4BFC3D3A2F@cisco.com> <20060323013237.GJ5716@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>

RFC 3041 is a good thing...

On Mar 22, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Tim Chown wrote:

If
RFC3041 addresses are used for senders (or for any application) at
least that harvestable information has its value to the attacker time
limited.

References:
- Address Scanning Document comments
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- Re: Address Scanning Document comments
  - From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Address Scanning Document comments
Next by Date: Re: Address Scanning Document comments
Previous by thread: Re: Address Scanning Document comments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread