Attached is a revision marked Word document that includes my comments to the proposed changes, some additional proposed changes from my notes, and my offers to draft some revised text for a few parts of the document. Regards, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-tewg-dt@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-tewg-dt@ops.ietf.org]On > Behalf Of Lai, Wai S (Waisum), ALSVC > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:38 PM > To: tewg-dt@ops.ietf.org > Subject: RE: call tommorow - agenda? > > > DT members, > Herewith are two attachments: > (1) The revised and diffmarked version of our draft for tomorrow's > discussion. > (2) As discussed in the London meeting, we should consider the > Owens draft. > I have reviewed it and thought that it might be useful to > summarize Section > 6 into our draft, and possibly include Sections 7 and 8 as > Appendices in our > draft. Other sections are mainly background or design considerations. I > have highlighted these remarks in the table of contents. > > As suggested by Jim below, I'll provide another update to > incorporate the > results of tomorrow's conference call and will have it ready by > early next week. > Talk to you tomorrow. > Thanks, Wai Sum. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Boyle [mailto:jboyle@pdnets.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 4:03 PM > To: tewg-dt@ops.ietf.org > Subject: call tommorow - agenda? > > > > We should all have reviewed any comments from the WG list or the DT list > (or private I suppose) which people still feel are open and warrant some > text revision. Then we can plot through the issues and decide what > changes might be needed. We can try to update the draft maybe by monday > or tuesday (he spoke freely of Waisum's time :) Comments to the DT lists > ahead of time good. > > regards, > > Jim > > >
restore_hierarchy-McD-Comments.doc