RE: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-02.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Some people who want to form an opinion on the size of
experimental/vendor-private name-space may find it
useful to check draft-narten-iana-experimental-allocations-05.txt
and specificall ysect 1.1. It is only a few pages...

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 9 januari 2004 12:10
> To: Ina Minei; Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; Tewg (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-02.txt
> 
> 
> Not sure why some people think (or that is how I 
> perceive your last email) that an AD has any more weight than
> other WG members. I have made my opinion clear that I think
> that 32 is far too much.
> 
> I have asked WG chairs to check this also.
> 
> It is best if WG chairs take initiative to drive resolution of
> these questions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bert 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ina Minei [mailto:ina@juniper.net]
> > Sent: vrijdag 9 januari 2004 1:19
> > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; Tewg (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-02.txt
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 	Bert,
> > 
> > 	So can we just agree on 32 "experimental/vendor private"
> > numbers starting at 255 and down?
> > 
> > 			Thank you,
> > 
> > 				Ina
> > 
> > On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Ina Minei wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > 	Bert,
> > >
> > > 	I think we both agree :). and in the end it all boils down to
> > > experimental vs vendor-private. What I am thinking of
> > > is vendor-private numbers, and what you are thinking of is 
> > experimental.
> > > We are both right. How we decide to solve it is a different issue.
> > >
> > > 	We can  either: 1) allocate two spaces, one for experimental and
> > > one for vendor-private. In that case, 3 should be enough 
> > for experimental,
> > > but as  for vendor-private more than 3 would be required, 
> > for the reason I
> > > was  mentioning in the original mail or 2) allocate one 
> > bigger space for
> > > both experimental and vendor-private. I prefer (2).
> > >
> > > 	Let's just pick one of the options, and carry it forward. Let me
> > > know what you prefer.
> > >
> > > 			Ina
> > >
> > 
>