RE: AD review of: draft-ietf-tewg-measure-05.txt

["Geib, Ruediger" <Ruediger.Geib@t-systems.com>]

Inline

| > The quality of the document is good as a Framework Document.
| 
| But the WG charter does not ask for a "framework doc" or at least not
| the way I understand it.

It says "Document additional measurements needed for TE (TEM)". That's 
the most precise reference I've found regarding measurements. 
 
| > I'd agree that an architecture or requirements doc 
| > getting more precise might be useful.  
| > Different network types and design philosophies result 
| > in different measurement requirements. I'm not sure whether an 
| > acceptable "General TE measurement requirements" doc is feasible.
| > 
| Well, Jeryr claims all the requirements are in the doc. Just too bad
| that it is very difficult to find them. That is why I asked for such
| a crsip list of requirements.

Jerry is absolutely right. The document lists everything which could 
be of use to support TE measurements. That's a kind of toolbox. 
It contains everything which is required and some hints how you'd
apply it. It doesn't contain a building plan. The first steps to this 
direction were an architecture document and some specific 
requirements.

| The IESG does NOT have a "qualification profile". 
| And EVERYONE's input and review is usefull and is welcome.
| What we DO want is that if we write something for OPERATIONAL networks
| that we DO get the input from the various types of OPERATORS that we
| know about.

Like Infonet.

Regards, Rüdiger