RE: WG last call: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-02.txt

["Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>]

Jim,

The enhancement to the MAM definition that we're discussing has ripple
effects into -proto and into -russian (BTW from memory I think that
would address part, or all, of Waisum's comment).

So I would suggest issueing a new rev of -proto and -russian with the
corresponding edits before posting to IESG. I could post those fairly
quickly once we've concluded on the MAM definition on the list.

Makes sense?

Cheers

Francois

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Boyle [mailto:jboyle@pdnets.com] 
>> Sent: 24 April 2003 21:38
>> To: te-wg@ops.ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: WG last call: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-02.txt
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This WG last call has ended.  There was one comment by 
>> Waisum, I don't 
>> think it was to object to this document.
>> 
>> Therefore this document is completed for WG discussion at this time.
>> 
>> It will be forwarded to IESG with the PROTO draft, which is 
>> through the 
>> 2nd week of it's 3 week WG last call.  
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>> On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Jim Boyle wrote:
>> 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-r
ussian-02.txt
> 
> This is WG last call for this draft to be advanced as expiremental
RFC.
> 
> Last call ends in 2 weeks (4/22).
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Jim Boyle
> 
> 
> 
>