RE: Preemption with MAM RE:

[Dimitry Haskin <dhaskin@axiowave.com>]

> 
> Dimmtry,
> 
> Francois,
> 
> > 
> > It may be that another model which has independent bandwidth 
> > constraint + aggregate constraint (this would basically be a 
> > hybrid between MAM and RDM) is a reasonable idea; but this is 
> > not MAM as it is currently defined.
> > 
> 
> Incidentally this is exactly what I have been assuming 
> regarding the MAM
> model. However I agree this is not reflected in the current MAM
> specification(s).
> 
> In current MAM specification, 
> do we have to define the maximum bandwidth such that sum of 
> the maximum bandwidth of each CT should be the link capacity ?

What is definition of the "link capacity" in your question? The aggregate
constraint (aka the maximum reservable link B/W) can be higher (or lower)
than the actual link capacity.

An aggregate constraint does not have to be equal to the sum of the
corresponding individual b/w constraints. However this might be a reasonable
thing to configure when preemption is not used.

Dimitry
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Geunhyung
> 
> > Francois
> > 
> 
>