RE: Request for comments: DSTE-MIB (draft-nadeau-mpls-dste-mib-00)

["Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>]

Sanjaya,

>>  Hi!
>>  The MIB as defined today is quite independent of individual BC
>>  Models(RD/MAM/MAR). The only reference to the BC models are 
>>  made in the following contexts:
>>  (i)  Examples of overall configurations (for sample scenarios)
>>  (ii) Examples of rules to be enforced to for different
>> 	BC models, based on the configured BC model.
>> 	[The draft requests user to refer to the BC Models 
>> 	drafts for details.]
>> 
>>  No structural changes will be need to support MAM. Just need
>>  to update the examples. I will incorporate these in rev-02
>>  of the draft.
>> 
>>  Supporting MAR BC Model, will need only incremental work (
>>  addition/extension of a table ). I can post the necessary 
>>  changes to the list (instead of directly adding them to
>>  the draft) for review. Once the WG finalizes the MAR BC
>>  model, we can update the MIB. 
>>  
>>  Does this sound like a plan? [Any other alternatives?]
>>  

This works me.
Thanks
Francois

>>  Thanks,
>>  sanjay
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 	     
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> >Cheers
>> 
>> >Francois
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>