Re: Another question on draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-01.txt

[Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>]

Dave,

At 12:48 04/07/2002 -0400, David Allan wrote:


> Section 3.3.1 states:
> ...LSRs MUST support for every LSP, an additional configurable parameter
> which indicates the Class Type of the Traffic trunk transported by the
> LSP...
>
> This implies a 1:1 relationship between TTs and LSPs, this wouldn't
> necessarily be true for an E-LSP. Now the mechanisms don't currently exist
> to support associating multiple class types/bandwidth constraints for an
> E-LSP, but if traffic trunk is exclusively an L-LSP concept, couldn't we pin
> this down a bit more explicitly..?
This is detailed in section "3.5. Mapping of Traffic to LSPs" of 
<draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-reqts-05.txt>.
We have not restated all assumptions of -reqts in the -proto draft. We just 
describe what extensions are required to satisfy those 
assumptions/requirements.

Thanks

Francois



> thanks
> Dave