Re: MPLS-DS-TE-MIB?

["Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>]

        BTW, I failed to mention that we will be cutting a new, up-to-date
version of the DS-TE MIB draft in the near future (probably within
the month of July), so others on the mailing list please send us your 
comments/suggestions based on the latest DS-TE protocol draft.

        --Tom



> The July/2001 version of MPLS-DS-TE-MIB draft has expaired.
> But I failed to find the current draft from IETF web site.
> Does anyone know the status of this draft?
>
> To the authors, there are two typos in July/2001 version.
>
> 1. In mplsDsTeIfMaxAddrUnresBw,  "Addr" really means "Aggr", I think.
>
> 2. The object MplsDsTeIfClassTypeEntry is defined twice.  Seems that the
>    second occurrence should be "MplsDsTeLspEntry" instead.
>
> Perhaps these can be corrected in the next revision.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Rupert


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.