[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: WG last call: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-reqts-04.txt
Francois,
> Do we know Service Providers who have a requirement for supporting
> multiple BC models in a given network? Personnaly, I haven't heard any
> yet. (Frankly I think DS-TE is sophisticated enough with a single BC
> model at any one time, I don't see the point for such complexity)
It is not a question of sophistication, but of flexibility.
Can you explain to me the point of complexity?
For me, as long as one computes correctly the
unreserved bandwidth for the TE-Class and
advertises, the solution should work.
That should be the only "requirement". This is a
local computation on the node considering the
BC model used on a given link. There is no need
to advertise the BC model to anybody. So how does
it increase complexity by allowing multiple models
in the network?
-Sudhakar