[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ClassType object for Signalling? Routing? Neither?

To: jboyle@pdnets.com, te-wg@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: ClassType object for Signalling? Routing? Neither?
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:58:17 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202221226190.1228-100000@fido>

I would go with (1) (ClassType object in signalling, inferred TEClasses
in the IGP).

It is a bit asymmetric, but the notion of 'hold priority' makes
signaling different anyway.

Kireeti.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ClassType object for Signalling? Routing? Neither?
  - From: Jim Boyle <jboyle@pdnets.com>

References:
- ClassType object for Signalling? Routing? Neither?
  - From: Jim Boyle <jboyle@pdnets.com>

Prev by Date: ClassType object for Signalling? Routing? Neither?
Next by Date: RE: ClassType object for Signalling? Routing? Neither?
Previous by thread: ClassType object for Signalling? Routing? Neither?
Next by thread: Re: ClassType object for Signalling? Routing? Neither?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread