[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Status of the WG



Michael Kirkham wrote:

As a compiler vendor I have a vested interest in supporting SMIng in
whatever form it takes, but not settling the ASN.1-like vs. New Grammar
issue seems to me to be a little detrimental to the SMIng effort.  More
recent discussions seemed to be based around the idea that SMIng would
continue to be ASN.1-like, which I think is unfortunate.
There are many reasons for preferring or not preferring things related to ASN.1, and I have to admit to being on the opposite side to Michael - surprise, surprise! But I hope that everybody realises that ASN.1 (standards and tools) now provides the ability to generate both compact binary encodings *and* XML documents from *the same* ASN.1 specification. Of course, it should be "proper" ASN.1, not a bastardised version, in order to maximise use of existing tools.

(Just stirring the pot and re-opening the argument! No-one need reply!)

John L