[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Status of the WG

To: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: Status of the WG
From: Dinakaran Joseph <dinakar@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:03:43 -0500
Cc: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "Durham, David" <david.durham@intel.com>, owner-sming@ops.ietf.org, "Randy Bush (E-mail)" <randy@psg.com>, "Sming (E-mail)" <sming@ops.ietf.org>

                                                                                                               
                                                                                                               
                                                                                                               



Andy Bierman > Keep in mind that the decision to abandon SMIv3 (and EOS)
Andy Bierman > sends a clear message to vendors and customers that SNMP
Andy Bierman > technology has reached its peak. What we have now is
Andy Bierman > as good as its ever going to get.  Those that are happy
Andy Bierman > with SNMPv3/SMIv2 will continue to use it.  Those looking
Andy Bierman > for something better will accelerate their efforts to
Andy Bierman > transition to something else.

I think we should try not to couple SMIv3 and EOS. Some of the enhancements
that EOS (Wes's draft) is proposing can be implemented rather easily and
will
greatly benefit customers.

Dinakaran.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Status of the WG
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Status of the WG
Next by Date: RE: Status of the WG
Previous by thread: RE: Status of the WG
Next by thread: RE: Status of the WG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread